Code of Conduct Pecas Ndahe

April 20, 2007 § 12 Komentar

Kontroversi kekerasan di IPDN yang berujung kematian dan kemunculan blog IPDNmania yang memicu “perang kata” di blogosphere telah membuat saya bertanya-tanya, perlukah ada semacam code of conduct untuk para blogger?

Aha, pertanyaan saya rupanya ada jawabannya. Dewa Web 2.0, Tim O’Reilly rupanya malah sudah selangkah lebih maju. Ia meluncurkan draft Blogger’s Code of Conduct. Tentu saja pemicunya bukan kasus IPDN, melainkan kasus Kathy Sierra.

Code of Conduct itu dibuat, kata O’Reilly, untuk menghindari kericuhan dan kekerasan dalam dunia maya yang dikenal dengan cyber-bullying. Saya sepakat dengan dia.

Beginilah kira-kira bunyi draft pertama Blogger’s Code of Conduct dari O’Reilly:

We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank and open conversation. But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. We present this Blogger Code of Conduct in hopes that it helps create a culture that encourages both personal expression and constructive conversation.

1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog.

We are committed to the “Civility Enforced” standard: we will not post unacceptable content, and we’ll delete comments that contain it.

We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that:
– is being used to abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others
– is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another person,
– infringes upon a copyright or trademark
– violates an obligation of confidentiality
– violates the privacy of others

We define and determine what is “unacceptable content” on a case-by-case basis, and our definitions are not limited to this list. If we delete a comment or link, we will say so and explain why. [We reserve the right to change these standards at any time with no notice.]

2. We won’t say anything online that we wouldn’t say in person.

3. We connect privately before we respond publicly.

When we encounter conflicts and misrepresentation in the blogosphere, we make every effort to talk privately and directly to the person(s) involved–or find an intermediary who can do so–before we publish any posts or comments about the issue.

4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action.

When someone who is publishing comments or blog postings that are offensive, we’ll tell them so (privately, if possible–see above) and ask them to publicly make amends.
If those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the perpetrator doesn’t withdraw them and apologize, we will cooperate with law enforcement to protect the target of the threat.

5. We do not allow anonymous comments.

We require commenters to supply a valid email address before they can post, though we allow commenters to identify themselves with an alias, rather than their real name.

6. We ignore the trolls.

We prefer not to respond to nasty comments about us or our blog, as long as they don’t veer into abuse or libel. We believe that feeding the trolls only encourages them–“Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it.” Ignoring public attacks is often the best way to contain them.

Versi bahasa Indonesia draft itu bisa di baca di :wikimu.

Saya ndak tahu apakah pedoman ini sebetulnya kita perlukan atau tidak. Mungkin ini juga terlalu berlebihan atau mengada-ada. Tapi, seperti halnya O’reilly, saya hanya berharap dunia maya menjadi lebih damai dan tenteram dengan adanya pedoman bersikap di antara para blogger.

Walaupun saya, juga O’reilly, ndak punya kekuasaan ataupun wewenang untuk memaksa semua blogger mengikuti aturan main, saya berharap banyak sampean semua mendukung Code of Conduct ini.

Bagaimana komentar sampean, Ki Sanak?

§ 12 Responses to Code of Conduct Pecas Ndahe

Tinggalkan komentar

«

»

What’s this?

You are currently reading Code of Conduct Pecas Ndahe at Ndoro Kakung.

meta